PGO發表安全特仕車款與M-Hybrid全新專利PGO unveils promotional safety versions and a new M-Hybrid patent

正體中文|English

PGO(摩特動力工業)在南臺灣高雄前鎮港的嘉信22號遊艇碼頭發表了2款安全特仕車款：

(1)   Spring 125 TCS Soteria，售價$99,800。

(2)   J-Bubu 125 ABS Soteria，售價$92,800。

PGO產品線系列大量採用Bosch的動力與動態電控架構，這一次將黃牌車款(TIG)的Bosch高階TCS+ABS+ECU控制系統下放至白牌車款(Spring)，具備有雙模式(Normal/Sport切換)、雙控制(噴射斷油+點火截斷)功能，讓TCS作動時的路面反應更敏捷有效。

PGO採用優惠價格來試探駕駛安全的市場：Spring TCS版比ABS版加價僅$2,000，J-Bubu ABS版比CBS版加價僅$8,800。

PGO已順利擁有登記的M-Hybrid輕油電系統，主要的更新是採用MOSFET(金屬氧化物半導體場效電晶體)快速與多工切換電路架構，取代了傳統短路式電路架構，讓ISO系統可以省下30%(引擎低速運轉)~ 60%(引擎高速運轉)的耗能。PGO預計在年底發表搭載這項M-Hybrid新專利的首發車款。

 

有關PGO Soteria安全特仕車上市，詳細的新聞參考連結：

https://reurl.cc/VMnrny

 

PGO M-Hybrid新專利的內容，詳細的報導參考連結：

https://reurl.cc/8XYK7X

PGO (MOTIVE POWER INDUSTRY Co., Ltd.) unveiled safety versions for its two scooter models at the Monte Fino Yacht Wharf in Qianzhen Port, Kaohsiung:

(1) Spring 125 TCS Soteria, priced at NT$99,800.
(2) J-Bubu 125 ABS Soteria, priced at NT$92,800.

PGO's product line extensively uses Bosch's power and dynamic electronic control architecture. This time, they have introduced the high-end Bosch TCS + ABS + ECU control system from the yellow-plate model(>200c.c.) (TIG) to the white-plate model (≦200c.c.)(Spring), featuring dual modes (Normal/Sport switch) and dual controls (fuel injection cut-off + ignition cut-off). This ensures a more agile and effective response when TCS is activated.

 

PGO tests the market for driving safety with discounted prices: The Spring TCS version is priced only NT$2,000 higher than the ABS version, and the J-Bubu ABS version is only NT$8,800 more than the CBS version.

 

PGO has successfully registered the M-Hybrid (mild-hybrid) system. The main update is the use of MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor) fast and multi-switching circuit architecture, replacing the traditional short-circuit architecture, allowing the ISO system to save 30% (engine at low speed) to 60% (engine at high speed) of energy consumption. PGO plans to launch its first model with this new M-Hybrid patent by the end of the year.

 

For detailed news on the launch of the PGO Soteria special safety models, refer to the following link:
https://reurl.cc/VMnrny

For detailed reports on PGO’s M-Hybrid new patent, refer to the following link:

https://reurl.cc/8XYK7X 

豐田規劃旗下全車型的「混動化」，而不是「電動化」Toyota plans hybridization across all its models rather than electrification

正體中文|English

在全球電動車產業歷經資源過度投入、商品化被過度期待的激情10年之後，Toyota在全球第二大單一市場 – 北美地區釋出訊息：將旗下Toyota、Lexus車款藉大改款時予以全面「混動化」(Hybrid或PHEV)，而不是「電動化」。

 

事實上，就技術演進、資源合理重新配置、以及最少社會成本完成產業轉型的綜合觀點來說，由內燃機車款、輕油電(48V)車款、油電混合、插電式油電混合、EREV增程式電動車，再過渡至BEV純電車款、清淨能源(氫能)車輛的汽車發展模式，對於全球(抗暖化)、主要經濟體(產業發展)、乃至於一般民眾(合理支出)的綜合效益最大。但即使Toyota持有的主要油電混合技術專利在2017年到期，許多汽車生產國選擇跳過油電混合技術發展的歷程，大量資源直接投入BEV純電車的發展：

 

(A)   歐盟：最大經濟體德國主導，政策性優惠BEV純電車、技術層次較低的輕油電車款，排擠(忽略)油電混合車款，藉以降低日本車廠的競爭優勢，並期待直接在BEV技術上取得產業領導地位。

(B)   美國，呈現兩極化發展：以加州領先主導的超低/淨零排放標準(2035年禁售燃油車)催生最成功電動車廠-Tesla的誕生；以德州為主的石化、汽車工業大州選擇規避承擔降低碳放量的責任，繼續擁抱內燃機汽車。

(C)   中國大陸：利用稀土金屬蘊藏量的超級寡占優勢，全力發展BEV純電車；同時也希望越過日本車廠的油電混合障礙(優勢)，藉BEV技術與生產優勢取得產業領導地位。

 

受限於電池在性能表現、生產成本、充放電使用安全的侷限，全球絕大部分的汽車製造商目前已經需要面對BEV純電車過早、未成熟鉅額投資投產的虧損。Toyota、BMW、Porsche

則是能夠遠離這一波BEV純電車經濟泡沫、且持續在低汙染低排放技術穩健投入的車廠。

 

關於汽車產業的良性發展路徑，本站在2010年有具體的描繪敘述，直到今年(2024年)還有些許參考價值，歡迎讀者察閱：

https://seztwnscope01.blogspot.com/2010/01/2010-dawning-for-automotive-industry.html

 

本篇新聞評論，新聞參考內容分別來自：

(1)   鉅亨網：燃油車掰了！傳豐田考慮全面發展油電混合車 放棄電動化 (2024-8-19)

https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/5688256

(2)   路透社：Hybrid cars throw lifeline to platinum metals (2024-9-9)

https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/hybrid-cars-throw-lifeline-platinum-metals-2024-09-09

After a passionate decade in the global electric vehicle (EV) industry, characterized by excessive resource investment and over-anticipated commercialization, Toyota has sent a message to the world’s second-largest single market—North America: it will fully "hybridize" (Hybrid or PHEV) its Toyota and Lexus models during model changes, rather than focusing on "electrification".

 

In fact, from the perspective of technological evolution, rational resource reallocation, and achieving industrial transformation with the lowest societal costs, the development model that transitions from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, mild hybrids (48V-spec), full hybrids, plug-in hybrids (PHEV), and range-extended electric vehicles (EREV), eventually to battery electric vehicles (BEV) and clean energy (hydrogen) vehicles, offers the greatest synergy benefits for the world (in terms of combating global warming), major economies (industrial development), and the general public (reasonable expenditures). However, despite Toyota’s key hybrid technology patents expiring in 2017, many automobile-producing countries chose to skip the hybrid technology development process, directly investing substantial resources in BEV development:

 

(A)   European Union: Led by the largest economy, Germany, which provides policy incentives for BEVs and lower-level mild-hybrid vehicles, while sidelining full hybrid models. This strategy aims to diminish the competitive edge of Japanese automakers and seeks to establish BEV leadership.

(B)   United States: A polarized development. On one hand, California's leadership in ultra-low/zero-emission standards (with a 2035 ban on fuel cars) has given rise to the most successful EV manufacturer, Tesla. On the other hand, major fossil fuel and automotive states, such as Texas, avoid the responsibility of reducing carbon emissions and continue embracing internal combustion engine vehicles (ICE).

(C)   Mainland China: Capitalizing on its super-monopoly in rare earth metals, it is fully committed to BEV development. China also seeks to bypass the hybrid advantage of Japanese automakers and aims to achieve industry leadership through BEV technology and production advantages.

 

Due to limitations in battery performance, production costs, and safety in charging and usage, most global automakers are now facing losses from premature, overly ambitious investments in BEV production. Toyota, BMW, and Porsche have managed to stay clear of this BEV economic bubble and continue steady investments in low-emission, low-pollution technologies.

 

For insights into a healthy development path for the automotive industry, our site provided a detailed description in 2010, which still holds some reference value today (2024). Readers are welcome to check it out:

https://seztwnscope01.blogspot.com/2010/01/2010-dawning-for-automotive-industry.html

 

This news commentary is based on the following sources:

(1)   ONUE: "Goodbye, gas-powered cars! Toyota reportedly considering fully focusing on hybrid vehicles, abandoning electrification" (2024-8-19)

https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/5688256

(2)   Reuters: "Hybrid cars throw lifeline to platinum metals" (2024-9-9)
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/hybrid-cars-throw-lifeline-platinum-metals-2024-09-09